Disclaimer: Only “roll call” votes are recorded.

Disclaimer: Only the attendance of committee members is recorded for committee meetings.

File #: R-041-21    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 5/14/2021 In control: Planning and Zoning Committee
On agenda: 6/10/2021 Final action: 6/10/2021
Title: A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW THE TYLER TOWN CENTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH REGARD TO LIMITED USE CATEGORY 2.
Sponsors: Stuart Benson (R-20)
Attachments: 1. R-041-21 V.1 052021 Requesting Review Tyler Town Ctr Planned Dev District.pdf, 2. RES 040 2021.pdf
RESOLUTION NO. ______________, SERIES 2021
Title
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW THE TYLER TOWN CENTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH REGARD TO LIMITED USE CATEGORY 2.
body
SPONSORED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER STUART BENSON

WHEREAS, the Tyler Town Center Planned Development District was created in 2010 for properties generally bounded by Taylorsville Road, I-265, Urton Lane, and Tucker Station Road, containing approximately 123 acres and being in Louisville Metro (the "PDD"); and
WHEREAS, a committee of the Louisville Metro Planning Commission has issued an interpretation impacting Limited Use Category 2 and, by extension, Area IIC of the PDD; and
WHEREAS, the Legislative Council of the Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government (the "Council") previously passed Resolution 036, Series 2020 directing the Louisville Metro Planning Commission (the "Planning Commission") to (i) codify the interpretation made by the committee, and (ii) review Limited Use Category 2 with respect to Area IIC of the PDD; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the items contained in Resolution 036, Series 2020 on May 6, 2021 to consider these items as a minor amendment to the PDD pursuant to Land Development Code ("LDC") 2.8.5.A.4; and
WHEREAS, during the May 6, 2021 Planning Commission hearing, some of the property owners within Area IIC of the PDD argued that the review of Limited Use Category 2 with respect to Area IIC of the PDD constituted a major amendment and should go through that process; but had no objection to the codification of the interpretation made by the committee as a minor amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted the codification of the interpretation made by the committee, but declined to change the uses in Area IIC of the PDD, as several of the commissioners were concerned that such a change should go throug...

Click here for full text